A discussion jointly prepared by Maggie Keeble, GP with special interest in palliative care and older people, Worcester, Dr Nick Cartmell GP lead for dementia, South Devon and Torbay CCG and Alistair Burns, National Clinical Director for Dementia, NHS England.
Q2. What is the benefit to patients in care homes of a dementia diagnosis and subsequent coding?
A diagnosis of dementia allows advanced care planning to be arranged and prompt discussion with family and carer about escalation planning to help prevent inappropriate admissions. It is well documented that hospital admissions for patients with dementia can be highly distressing for them and their families and can also be very challenging for acute hospital units. Length of stay tends to be longer and readmission rates are higher in patients with dementia.
It is also really important that we diagnose and code patients with dementia so that their risk of delirium may be understood should they do need to go into hospital. A diagnosis can also explain some behaviour’s and may help moderate use of antipsychotic drugs.
Most trusts are using the Dementia CQUIN and therefore should have dementia pathways in place to improve care and speed up timely discharge.
It allows for an assessment of mental capacity with, if indicated, a best interests meeting and Deprivation of Liberty safeguards (DoLS) consideration.
If someone has a diagnosis of dementia there is no reason for that not to be recorded on the clinical record. Firstly it is good practice to have accurate clinical records and secondly other agencies who come into contact with the person such as secondary care, ambulance or out of hours services will then know the person they are dealing with has dementia and will treat them accordingly.
Finally if care homes understand exactly how many residents they have with dementia they are more likely to upskill staff, create suitable environments and manage challenging behaviours better as a result.
It should be noted that there may be some unintended consequences of confirming a diagnosis of dementia. Firstly that care homes might expect to charge more for care or it may prompt a need to find alternative provision if that particular residential home was not registered for people with dementia. Local authorities have a duty to assess the needs of people with dementia and can help arrange transfer to facilities more suited to the needs of people with dementia if required.
Q3. Where there is an established diagnosis of dementia for a care home resident, what is the case for use of dementia medication (as opposed to antipsychotic medications) and what are the benefits?
The specific anti dementia medications are for Alzheimer’s disease so that diagnosis would have to be made. One would have to be very clear as to what symptoms were being targeted by prescribing medication and what improvements might be expected. There is certainly no justification for the blanket prescription of these medications in care homes once a diagnosis is made. A joint protocol here between primary and secondary care may be helpful.
Q4. If I code these patients they will appear on my QOF register for dementia - I will then be expected to do blood tests and the 15 month review - The blood tests are not likely to affect patients outcome so what is the point in distressing them and taking blood?
One would clearly not want to take blood if inappropriate and if this were the case a patient can be exempted from QOF. Equally if a patient has a historical diagnosis of dementia but was never coded, backdating Read entry will also remove the need for bloods.
However bloods are important to exclude treatable causes of cognitive loss and so should be done if the above does not apply and doing them is not difficult nor is interpreting the result. Once a diagnosis is made no further blood tests are required, although it would be appropriate to check bloods in people known to be at risk of certain other disorders such as vitamin or thyroid deficiency or anaemia.
The 15 month review of cognition, functioning, well-being, medications along with carer views are important, even for people in a care home setting, so annual review exceptions should be very few. This review can be done with colleagues in the Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) particularly Community Psychiatric nurses or suitably qualified care home staff.
Q5. Can I exception code those patients in Care Homes with Dementia as unsuitable for intervention (i.e. blood tests and reviews)?
The GP contract and QOF expects all patients to be treated equally regardless of their residence. You should only exception code if there is very good reason to do so. It is possible to except a patient from the initial blood screening tests but without excepting from the care plan review. Each is recorded separately and not interconnected. As stated above, the number excepted from both blood test and annual review should be very few.
Q.6 If we then code a high percentage of patients with code 9HD0 code ‘unsuitable’ it will put up our exception codes which will look bad on our ‘dashboards’ for the Area Team. How can we avoid being criticised for high ‘Exception rates’ for patients with Dementia in Care Homes?
Patients cannot be added to the register and then excepted because they live in a care home. Excepting from initial diagnostic tests is more justifiable than excepting from annual review so if GPs do except a lot of patients from the annual review Area Teams would be justified in seeking an explanation from the GPs for why this is the case. This applies to other QOF domains too.
Q7. I have to do a care plan for the unplanned admission DES for all my patients in Care Homes – does review of the Care Plan constitute a Dementia Review?
A diagnosis of dementia will trigger the preparation of a care plan, if not already in place, and ongoing reviews as per QOF requirements. Dementia reviews will inform a person’s ongoing care plan and should be undertaken every 15 months or sooner if required or circumstances change. A dementia review will cover many items within the care plan prepared for an unplanned admission such as advance care planning, mental capacity assessment but there would need to be evidence in the case notes that dementia relevant aspects of care were also considered.
In summary a care plan for unplanned admission cannot be substituted for a dementia review as there are additional considerations to be assessed and monitored that are in addition to the ‘standard’ care plan. Many GPs schedule the dementia review to coincide with annual medicines review as often more relevant to consider both together. In all cases the review should take place face to face rather than by phone
Q8. We are swamped with work at the moment – we haven’t time to review all our patients in care homes without a dementia diagnosis to see if they do indeed have dementia. Who will do this work for us?
Only people with a suspicion of dementia should be assessed and whilst this may involve significant number of residents initially it should be relatively straightforward to maintain. Developing close working relationships between primary and secondary care services has helped many teams address this, and develop shared care protocols and ongoing support arrangements.
GPs should have a close working relationship with their local care home, ideally one GP per home, with earmarked time for regular visits to review residents and undertake added value work including dementia reviews and care plans, advanced care planning and medicine reviews. This should help reduce both GP calls from care homes for acute visits and inappropriate hospital admissions.
A financial incentive may help address any significant backlog for assessments and suggest you explore this with your local commissioners and memory service providers. In the longer term it may be feasible to pull back funding from acute hospitals that can be invested back into primary care to enhance the service though appreciate this is often easier said than done!
Q9. When a person has found all the patients with dementia in a care home who is going to put those codes on our computer system and except them if appropriate?
This is likely to be a one off exercise and unlikely to take much administrative time as long as your clinical record of the assessment is clear. Most practices have administration staff trained to add Read Codes to patient records. To help with this, regions are in the process of providing a list of suggested common Read codes for use in primary care. Please contact your local dementia lead for more information.
Administration staff can exception code but really exception coding is a GP decision so they would need to be asked to do so by the GP.
Q10. Are there any benefits to my practice of putting more patients on my Dementia Register?
The provision of better care should be the prime incentive
A practice QOF income depends on two things: first their recorded prevalence of each clinical condition (e.g. bloods done at diagnosis and annual reviews). Thus the more patients’ on the dementia register the more £’s per point the practice earns. The prevalence effect on QOF income is more potent than the point’s effect so it is actually better to have a larger prevalence and miss some points than keep prevalence low and get all the points.
A diagnosis of dementia triggers the identification of carers who are likely to be registered with the practice. Carers do nearly all the work of caring for patients with dementia so helping them to maintain their health and wellbeing and providing the support and information they need will increase their ability to cope with less reliance on the GP.
By improving patient care and by recognising dementia, developing advanced care plans etc. the number of call outs to care homes in an emergency may well decrease. This will also support the new 2% unplanned admissions enhanced service for GPs.
An innovative relationship with the local memory service could facilitate earlier and better assessments if people develop challenging behaviour.
If a patient has a clinical record of a diagnosis of dementia this is more likely to appear on their death certificate. Dementia is under recorded as a contributory cause of death.
Q11. Why is there such an emphasis on Dementia diagnosis when the provision of Dementia Support Services in Care Homes is already so limited?
This is really a ‘cart before the horse’ argument. If we increase diagnosis rates this will help drive up provision of better services both in care homes and the community. Once better services are in place diagnosis rates should increase.
We know dementia support services in care homes do vary by area and provider. As well as covering issues around environment and activities it also advises on staff training especially around advanced care planning and end of life care.
Care homes are expected to provide a ‘regular scheduled programme of activities in order to stimulate and engage people with dementia according to individual needs, wishes and lifestyles’. Several care homes now provide cognitive stimulation therapy and access to other therapies. The voluntary sector and other agencies can play a significant role in providing other types of support in these environments.
A blog on care homes and dementia appears at:
NHS England - Alistair Burns blog